For many investors, climate risk often shows up in long-term projections and policy debates, which can make it feel distant from day-to-day investing decisions. Yet for many advisors and their clients, the impact is already visible in a far more practical place: insurance renewals and coverage terms.
They price risk in real time, using modeled exposure, historical losses, and forward-looking assumptions about hazards like flooding, wildfire, and severe storms. Increasingly, those signals are becoming harder to ignore and in many regions, property owners are already seeing it firsthand.
Commercial property insurance premiums have risen sharply in recent years, with many markets experiencing double-digit increases as insurers adjust pricing to reflect changing risk profiles, according to the Marsh Global Insurance Market Index. At the same time, global insured losses from natural catastrophes reached approximately $107 billion in 2025, marking the sixth consecutive year above $100 billion, based on data from the Swiss Re Institute.
These are not isolated data points. They reflect a broader shift: risk is being repriced, and insurance is often where that repricing shows up first.
Insurance as an Early Signal of Market Change
When insurers reassess exposure—whether due to increased storm intensity, wildfire frequency, or flood risk—it can directly affect the cost of owning and operating property, the availability of coverage in certain regions, and the long-term economics of specific assets.
In some cases, coverage becomes more expensive. In others, it becomes more limited. In the most extreme scenarios, it may become unavailable altogether.
This matters because insurance is not just a line item. It is often a prerequisite for financing, development, and ongoing property operations. Changes in pricing or availability can ripple through the entire real estate value chain. From an investor’s perspective, that creates a useful lens. Insurance markets can act as an early signal, highlighting where physical risks are increasing and where property-level economics may begin to shift.
From Premiums to Property Values
The connection between insurance and property values is not always immediate, but it can be consequential over time. Higher insurance costs can reduce net operating income. Limited coverage can introduce financing challenges. And persistent exposure to climate-related hazards can influence long-term demand for certain locations.
Research from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has increasingly highlighted how climate risk and insurance availability could influence housing markets, lending conditions, and broader financial stability. What begins as a pricing adjustment in insurance markets can evolve into a broader reassessment of risk across real estate markets—affecting how assets are valued, financed, and allocated.
Risk Is Becoming More Differentiated
One of the more important implications of this shift is that real estate risk may be becoming more uneven. Two properties may look similar on traditional metrics but differ meaningfully in their exposure to physical climate risks. Geography matters. So does the underlying mix of assets within a portfolio.
This is already reflected in how insurers operate. Pricing is increasingly location-specific, informed by modeled loss data across multiple hazards.
A similar lens is beginning to take shape in investment conversations. Rather than viewing real estate as a single, uniform allocation, investors are increasingly asking a more nuanced question: how does risk vary across locations, property types, and portfolios?
For financial advisors, this shift is showing up day after day. Clients are seeing rising premiums, coverage limitations, or non-renewals on their own properties, and asking a straightforward but difficult question: is my real estate still safe?
Insurance could help ground that conversation. It can provide a tangible way to explain how risk is already being assessed and priced. When insurers adjust pricing for certain regions or hazards, it can offer insight into how property markets may evolve over time.
What Advisors Are Hearing From Clients
For many advisors, this shift is no longer theoretical. Rising premiums, tighter terms, or non-renewals are prompting clients to ask where their properties, and by extension their broader real estate exposures, are still appropriately protected. Insurance data can help ground those conversations by showing where risk is already being reassessed and how it may influence property-level economics over time.
A Subtle Shift in How Real Estate Is Evaluated
For investors, the takeaway is not that real estate risk is increasing across the board—but that it may be becoming more differentiated across markets. Insurance trends suggest that location-specific risks can influence property-level economics, which in turn can affect income, financing, and long-term valuations. Over time, that can contribute to variation in outcomes across real estate portfolios.
As a result, climate resilience is emerging as one additional lens, alongside sector exposure, tenant quality, and balance sheet strength, when evaluating real estate investments. Some investment approaches are beginning to reflect this shift more directly.
For investors using listed REITs, an approach like CLIM may offer a way to incorporate climate resilience considerations into a traditional real estate allocation, using a rules‑based process that remains focused on measurable, property‑level risk.
This is not a replacement for traditional analysis. It is a refinement, one that reflects how risk is already being priced in adjacent markets.
A Signal Worth Paying Attention To
Insurance markets will not capture every aspect of real estate risk, and they are not perfect predictors. But because they often respond early when conditions change, they can help investors and advisors ask sharper questions about how location specific risks may influence real estate portfolios in the years ahead. For those interested in how these signals are translated into listed REIT strategies, reviewing the Climate Resilient Real Estate Index methodology and CLIM’s prospectus and risk disclosures can be a useful next step.
Sources:
Source: Marsh
Title: Global Insurance Market Index
Link: https://www.marsh.com/en/services/risk-management/insights/global-insurance-market-index.html
Source: Swiss Re Institute
Title: Natural catastrophes in 2025: insured losses exceed $100 billion again
Link: https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sigma-research.html
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Title: Climate change, natural disasters and insurance
Link: https://www.oecd.org/finance/climate-change-natural-disasters-and-insurance.htm
Carefully consider the Funds’ investment objectives, risk factors, charges and expenses before investing. This and additional information can be found in the Fund’s Prospectus and Summary Prospectus, which may be obtained by visiting www.climateglobaletf.com. Read the Prospectus and Summary Prospectus carefully before investing.
The Fund is distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC serves as the investment advisor. The Fund is distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC., which is not affiliated with Climate Global, Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC, or any of its affiliates.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. The Fund’s return may not match or achieve a high degree of correlation with the return of the Index. To the extent the Fund’s investments are concentrated in or have significant exposure to a particular issuer, industry or group of industries, or asset class, the Fund may be more vulnerable to adverse events affecting such issuer, industry or group of industries, or asset class than if the Fund’s investments were more broadly diversified. Issuer-specific events, including changes in the financial condition of an issuer, can have a negative impact on the value of the Fund.
A new or smaller fund is subject to the risk that its performance may not represent how the fund is expected to or may perform in the long term. In addition, new funds have limited operating histories for investors to evaluate and new and smaller funds may not attract sufficient assets to achieve investment and trading efficiencies.
Shares are bought and sold at market price (closing price) not net asset value (NAV) and are not individually redeemed from the Fund. Market price returns are based on the midpoint of the bid/ask spread at 4:00pm Eastern Time (when NAV is normally determined) and do not represent the return you would receive if you traded at other times. Brokerage commissions will reduce returns.
